I confess I am not a fan. Notwithstanding, I consult Wikipedia for "indisputable" material like maths, geography, dates of birth, movies release...you got the flavour, right? That's fine and practical. Things get hotter when there’s a general agreement and when there’s widespread disagreement on values or facts, as with, say, the origins of communism; you get both sides. Not optimum, though, because both sides are forced to make their point by emphasizing the contrast with the other side. As a result, it is not a reliable source. Instead, buy a good book, read a good article or just follow a great blog. The trouble comes when one side is right and the other side is wrong and neither are aware of it. The Shakespeare authorship page and the Shroud of Turin page or Global Warming vs. Sckeptics are scenes of constant conflict and are packed with unreliable or inaccurate information. Arguably, this can be seen as democracy at work. I personally think this is pure and intra...