This is a guest post by Chris Jobse of Eperium Business
Solution (http://www.eperium.com/).
He is a senior PIM architect advising customers to organize their data in the
most efficient way to serve their eCommerce goals.
The management of correct and detailed product information
is becoming increasingly important for many companies. The volume of
information is growing, the number of products increasing, the products are
sold in more countries and laws and legislation impose demands on the product
information. Implementing a PIM (Product Information Management) system is more
frequently becoming a strategic choice. Why one PIM system is more expensive
than the other is a question that is frequently raised. Understandably, after
all suppliers state that they manage product information and this is certainly
so in all cases. There are big differences among the various PIM systems. The differences
are mainly in the underlying technology, the functionality set and last, but
not least, how the supplier’s organisation is set up.
Three types of PIM
PIM suppliers can be roughly divided into three groups:
- Enterprise PIM
- New Players
- Open Source Players
Let’s take a look at each in greater detail.
Enterprise PIM
There are players that have been active in the market for
years and often come from the world of print and, to a lesser degree, from the
world of e-commerce. These often highly advanced products facilitate a wide
range of functions, which are sometimes accommodated in (separately sold)
modules. Thanks to their years of experience, these PIM suppliers also have the
advantage that they have much support worldwide and that they are a stable factor
in the world of IT suppliers. In short, operational risks are kept to a
minimum. Examples of these are Informatica PIM (formerly Heiler), Hybris and
Stibo.
New Players
In addition to these 'big' systems, new players have
appeared on the market in recent years. This development is driven by the
ever-growing e-commerce market. This usually entails smaller companies (around
50 persons) that have developed PIM products from within a specific sector and
have introduced them to the market as generic products. The functionality set is
often somewhat more limited than the big PIM systems, especially in terms of
the possibility to load automated product information in the system. This may
involve implementing a great deal of additional software. Examples of these PIM
systems are the DAM Group, Perfion, ContentServe, inRiver and many more.
Open Source Players
This third group deserves a special mention. These products
are indeed also technically modern. However, the open source PIM systems
currently available on the market offer extremely limited functionality. The
nature of open source is that the community contributes to further the development
of the product. If the underlying organisation is not set up adequately, the
commercial risk is high. A PIM system within a company is often a
business-critical application. Examples of open source PIM systems are Akeneo
and PimCore.
Do I now know which
PIM system I need?
The above-mentioned classification certainly prompts
considerations regarding operational efficiency and commercial risks. However,
the question of which PIM system is suitable for your organisation is to be
answered. To determine this, several more factors will have to be taken into
consideration. The following questions are the beginning of an exploration
process that lays the foundations for a proper PIM implementation.
- Are printed catalogs widely used?
- What are the plans for e-commerce in the future?
- Will several websites be supported from within one product database?
- Will the e-commerce site support multiple languages?
- How many suppliers have to be connected to the PIM system?
- Do the suppliers have to be able to change/add data in the PIM system themselves?
What should I do?
There are still a number of factors that have to be taken
into account in order to be able to make the right choice. This is difficult.
What's more, the choice to be made is a strategic choice within your
organisation. You see, the cost of setting up a PIM may be as much as the
licence or more. Processes in your organisation will have to be aligned with
the PIM’s and more importantly, your customers will ultimately have to benefit
from having access to the correct item information. If you do not have the
required expertise in-house, it pays to engage a specialist that can help you
with the selection and implementation process.
Comments
I would like to add something to the third group of open source systems. Such systems may have limited functionality, but there is always the ability to install additional modules. Now in the market there is another system TreoPIM, which is a free solution with many built-in functions. If someone would like to compare the open source PIM systems TreoPIM, Akeneo and Pimcore, I would recommend this article: https://treolabs.com/journal/treopim-pimcore-akeneo-open-source-pim-systems-in-comparison