Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence i.e. Doing without Thinking


AI may prove more dangerous as it advances, but it will never generate actual intelligence so long as the basic assumptions of the field remain unchanged. Take the LLMs: they scan and process texts often in a way that is indistinguishable from human output, while lacking any understanding or cognitive ability. It is undeniable even to the most sceptical to recognise LLMs extraordinary capabilities.

It doesnโ€™t help the cause to be sceptical or optimistic, though. What I believe is helpful, is to see AI for what it is - #realAI. It is probably not sexy nor very appealing โ€“ a real disappointment for those in the business of generating hot air.

When IBMโ€™s Deep Blue won against Garry Kasparov in 1997, the Chess grandmaster said: โ€œAnything we can do (โ€ฆ) machines will do it better (โ€ฆ) If we can codify it, and pass it to computers, they will do it better.โ€ There is a clue in Kasparovโ€™s words: i๐‘–๐‘“ ๐‘ค๐‘’ ๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘› ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘‘๐‘–๐‘“๐‘ฆ ๐‘คโ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘ก ๐‘ค๐‘’ ๐‘‘๐‘œ. The thing is that we are still trying to understand how is it that human beings are intelligent. Many aspects of our cognition remain mysterious; we are yet to codify the process. Could it be that the road to Artificial General Intelligence is closed by our lack of clarity regarding how the brain works?

Luciano Floridi has some interesting remarks: โ€œWe have not even yet comprehended how the human brain functions; we do not know what consciousness is. We are beginning to grasp some ideas now, but it remains a largely uncharted territory. ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป, ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐—ธ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜„๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ? ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ. However, the analogy of the brain to a computer is losing its grip as we now know it is not so [...] we are moving on to the next technology, the quantum computer, repeating the same mistake.โ€ Spot on.


I am increasingly becoming persuaded that another ๐‘จ๐‘ฐ ๐‘พ๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’†๐’“ may come โ€“ but it is avoidable. And if it comes, it can help cool things down a bit. I maintain that we would make some real progress the moment we ๐’”๐’•๐’๐’‘ ๐’‚๐’๐’•๐’‰๐’“๐’๐’‘๐’๐’Ž๐’๐’“๐’‘๐’‰๐’Š๐’”๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐‘จ๐‘ฐ, weak, strong, general, and whatnot.  AI is a machine designed to process data. Thatโ€™s as far as it goes. A human, on the other hand, is something far more complex than a machine that processes information. We do process information, but we also have emotions, creativity, critical reflection and intuition, as well as many other qualities, not to mention a biology that a machine cannot replicate.


Letโ€™s cut through the AI hype thatโ€™s permeating the current ๐’›๐’†๐’Š๐’•๐’ˆ๐’†๐’Š๐’”๐’• in the business world.

Comments